Alliances and WWII essays

Alliances and WWII essays U.S. foreign policy before the relative turn of the 20th century was rather non-existent. The desire of the new country was to develop individually and become strong. They saw other nations as a threat considering the British and French colonization and the fight for independence. The Monroe Doctrine was enacted to stave off the rest of the world, specifying that they had no business in the Western Hemisphere. During the Civil War, the South wanted assistance by Britain and France. The North saw this to be ignorant and a major threat, if granted, considering the past (McDougall, 97.) Even through the beginning of the 20th century, the U.S. remained isolated as much as international conflict would permit. With the growing struggles for power and the U.S.s general amiability for democracy and tyrannical suppression, they began to ally. After World War II they developed international organizations such as the United Nations, NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization,) and SEATO ( Southeast Asia Treaty Organization.) Current politics affect the U.S.s less than steady amount of involvement in these organizations. The U.S. generally enters alliances to balance others gaining too much power. It sees its current unipolar status is a fine thing that it is intent on retaining, though methods in so doing vary. Alliances with other countries were avoided in the first part of the century but later became necessary. The U.S. preferred to remain unilateral to avoid entangling themselves with other countries. Wilson remained out of the World War I conflict until it directly affected the U.S. He claimed it was an old world quarrel. Intervention came only when Germany began sinking U.S. ships. After World War I, the U.S. wanted to keep peace and punish Germany, but didnt expect unrealistic reparations. Wilson thought the Treaty of Versailles was unrealistic. According to Walter A. McDougall, in Promised...

This essay includes a summary, quotes, the biggest issues, the arguements for the prosecutor and defendent,key dates, the people involved, and what happened as a result of Nixon v. US.

This essay includes a summary, quotes, the biggest issues, the arguements for the prosecutor and defendent,key dates, the people involved, and what happened as a result of Nixon v. US. Watergate, as the scandal was dubbed, began with the burglary of the Democratic Party's campaign headquarters at the Watergate apartment and office complex. The burglary was committed on June 17, 1972 at 2:30 a.m. by five men: Bernard L. Barker, a former C.I.A. operative, Virgilio Gonzalez, a refugee from Cuba, James McCord, a security coordinator for the Republican National Committee and the Committee for the Re-election of the President, and a former C.I.A. and F.B.I. agent, Eugenio Martinez, who was connected to the C.I.A., and Frank A. Strugis who also had C.I.A. connections. These men were caught in the act trying to intercept telephone and other communications by a security guard named Frank Willis. Their arrest, along with the investigation by the Washington Post eventually uncovered a White House-sponsored plan of espionage against Nixon's political opponents which led to a complicated trail that was traced to many of the highest officials in the United States.Nixon and Paine at Apollo 12 LaunchThis case revolved around three key issues. The first regarded the Constitutional idea known as the separation of powers. In the end it was decided that this idea was not intended to have the three branches operate absolutely independent of each other. The second issue involved what is known as executive privilege. This case tested whether or not the Executive branch has the power to keep executive documents and other communications out of public view and away from the other two branches of government. The Court ruled that the President does not have the right to withhold information simply on the grounds of confidentiality. The third point brought up in Court was known as justiciability. This questions whether or not the court has the jurisdiction to issue the subpoena because the matter was an "intra-branch dispute between a subordinate and superior officer of the Executive...

Strategic operation management- case study Essay

Strategic operation management- case study - Essay Example ontracted to provide the garments was the need to specify the dyeing colors earlier, because they used dyed yarn to knit the garments rather than dyeing the garments after the knitting process was complete. (Stevensons:4). As a result, much of the dyeing business that Stevensons once carried out was shifted offshore, as a part of the overall garment manufacturing process. The positive consequences of off-shoring the garment production is the reduction in costs that was achieved. The average cost of dyeing and assembly of a garment by overseas suppliers was 35 pence less than the garment dyeing process. (Stevensons:6). This produced cost savings for the retailers. Moreover, the savings of 2 and a half pounds which the retailer could purportedly save of the 2 pounds and eighty five cents charged by Stevensons, required verification and working on with the ecru garment supplier, therefore the cost savings could not be verified. The problem of whether to assemble the knitted garment before or after dyeing was also eliminated by sending the garments to the offshore suppliers because the yarn itself was dyed before knitting the garment. Hence retailers were no longer subjected to the pressures of allocation of costs between the knitting factory and the finishing factory, and dealing with the uneven demand profile that was created by the need to assemble the garment before the dyeing process. One of the negative consequences for retailers was in the timing of the coloring decisions. Due to the variability in customer demand factors, retailers gained an advantage from being able to delay the coloring decision as long as possible, up to 4-5 weeks before actual sale and CV’s policy of completing the dyeing after the garment was assembled was helpful in making flexible color selections to respond appropriately to peaks in demand. . In order to be responsive to changing customer tastes, especially in the fashion and retail industries, the entire supply chain needs to be